Harbir Singh v. The State of U.P. Thru. the Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Education Deptt. Lko. and 4 Others

Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9180 of 2023 Petitioner :- Harbir Singh Respondent :- The State Of U.P. Thru. The Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Education Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gyanendra Kumar Pandey,Apoorv Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ran Vijay Singh,Shivam Sharma Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1, 4 and 5, Sri Prashant Kumar Singh holding brief of Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.2, and Sri Shivam Sharma, learned counsel for respondent no.3.

¶2With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition is being decided finally.

¶3Instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondents to consider the transfer of the petitioner from District Raebareli to District Baghpat or any nearby district to Baghpat.

¶4Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.2 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsels for respondents have no objection.

¶5In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.2 then respondent no.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of four weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order.

¶6With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off.

¶7It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 29.11.2023 A. Katiyar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench