VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Smt. X (Victim of the Case Crime No 218/2022) v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko and Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
29 November 2023
Bench
Narendra Kumar Johari, Sangeeta Chandra
Case no.
8586/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8586 of 2023 Petitioner :- Smt. X (Victim Of The Case Crime No 218/2022) Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prem Shanker Pandey,Abhishek Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Shikhar Anand, Advocate on behalf of respondent no. 4 today is taken on record. An afÏdavit of service filed by Sri Prem Shankar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and short counter afÏdavit filed by learned AGA on behalf of State-respondents today are taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Shikhar Anand, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 and learned AGA who appears on behalf of State-respondents. This writ petition has been filed praying the following main reliefs: "i. To issue writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties specially the opposite party no. 02 & 03 to do fair investigation and to arrest the accused persons who are moving freely and continuously threatening the petitioner for dire consequences and to withdraw the complaint. ii. To issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 4 not to interfere in the pending investigation as the opposite party no. 4 is having no jurisdiction to interfere in the investigation." Learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 has produced before this Court a copy of order dated 6.7.2023 passed by the Chairman of U.P. Human Right Commission, Lucknow wherein it has been stated that after taking cognizance, this Court vide its order dated 31.5.2023 has quashed the orders dated 7.2.2203 and 23.2.2023 passed by the Commission. The Chairman, Human Right Commission, Lucknow has closed the proceedings/case that was pending before the Commisison. Learned AGA, on the basis of his short counter afÏdavit, has stated that charge sheet has been prepared against main accused Sujit Kumar Tripathi @ Sonu Tripathi on

6.11.2023 under various sections of IPC and SC/ST Act. The other accused Satish Tripathi S/o Suryakant Tripathi has not yet been charge sheeted because from the evidence that has been collected including CCTV footage, no specific conclusion could be drawn by the Investigating OfÏcer. The original DVR containing the CCTV footage has been sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory for its report, after such report is made available steps shall be taken against other accused as well. This writ petition is disposed of leaving it open for the petitioner to approach the court concerned, in case, she is still dissatisfied with the investigation being carried out by the Investigating OfÏcer. Order Date :- 29.11.2023 AKK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.