Karan Rawat v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Court No. -11 Case :-APPLICATION U/S 482 No. -11634 of 2023 Applicant :-Karan Rawat Opposite Party :-State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :-Pradyumn Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :-G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard. The present application under Section 482 CrPC has been filed with following prayer:-"Wherefore, it is most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble High Court may kindly be pleased to issue a direction to the court below to accept the personal bond and two sureties in one case and treat the same good for all other criminal cases mentioned in para No.5 in the present application relates to the applicant." Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in 5 cases. He next submitted that in all the case registered against the applicant, he has been granted bail by the court below. He says that the applicant is a poor person, thus, he is not in a position to furnish huge sureties for all the cases in compliance of bail orders. It is further submitted that the details of cases registered against the applicant are as follows:-

(i) Case Crime No. 252 of 2023, under Section 457, 380, 411, 413 I.P.C., Police Station-Gangaghat, District-Unnao

(ii) Case Crime No. 33 of 2023, under Section 457, 380, 411 I.P.C., Police Station-Sohramau, District-Unnao

(iii) Case Crime No. 34 of 2023, under Section 457, 380, 411 I.P.C., Police Station-Sohramau, District-Unnao

(iv) Case Crime No. 630 of 2018, under Section 13 Gambling Act, Police Station-Gangaghat, District-Unnao

(v) Case Crime No. 374 of 2023, under Section 2/3, U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986, Police Station-Gangaghat, District-Unnao Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8914-8915 of 2018; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P. Learned A.G.A. submits that he does not want to file any counter affidavit. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case as well as rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands disposed of finally in the light law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and the Court below is directed to execute the personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- in every case and produce two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court/Magistrate concerned in one case which shall hold good for rest of the cases. Order Date :- 29.11.2023 Raj High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench