- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 29 November 2023
- Bench
- Pankaj Bhatia
- Case no.
- 815/2022
Judgment
Court No. - 8 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 815 of 2022 Petitioner :- Hafeez Respondent :- District Magistrate Bahraich And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Krishan Kanhaya Pal,Pooja Pal,Vinay Shankar Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
¶1The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 17.02.2020 whereby the benefit of debt waiver scheme has been denied to the petitioner on the ground that no debt is payable in terms of the statement of the bank.
¶2It is argued that the bank has got issued a legal notice for payment of dues, however no recovery proceedings have been initiated.
¶3As the impugned order itself records that as per the information received from the Bank, no liability exists on the petitioner, the petition filed by the petitioner is premature.
¶4In case any recovery proceedings are initiated against the petitioner, he would be at liberty avail such remedy as may be advised under law. Order Date :- 29.11.2023 VNP/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.