VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Jalebi Devi v. Suneel Kumar, Exe. Engineer, Vidyut Vitran Khand,(Ses-Second) Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd

Dismissed on merits/Rejected
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
29 November 2023
Bench
Rajesh Singh Chauhanauthor
Case no.
1392/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 4 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1392 of 2023 Applicant :- Jalebi Devi Opposite Party :- Suneel Kumar, Exe. Engineer, Vidyut Vitran Khand,(Ses-Second) Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd Counsel for Applicant :- Mukesh Sharma,Pawan Kumar Sharma Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ran Vijay Singh, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party. Said Vakalatnama is taken on record.

¶2Sri Ran Vijay Singh has drawn attention of this Court towards the order of the writ court dated 23.12.2022 passed in Writ-A No.8796 of 2022, which reads as under:- "Heard Sri Lalendra Pratap Singh,Advocate holding brief of Sri Mukesh Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no.1 and Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 to 5. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the husband of the petitioner after attaining the age of superannuation retired in the year 2013 from the post of Mate and some retiral dues were paid to him. The husband of the petitioner also died on 27.09.2018 but all the retiral dues have not been paid to the petitioner despite representation made by the petitioner on 28.09.2020 and 12.02.2021. Accordingly, he made an innocuous prayer for a direction to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner and make the payment of the remaining retiral dues within some short stipulated period. Learned Counsel for the respondents have no objection to the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of above, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent no.5 to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 28.09.2020 contained in Annexure No.2 to the writ petition expeditiously say within a period of three weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order."

¶3Sri Ran Vijay Singh has stated that all admissible dues/ retiral dues have already been paid to the husband of the petitioner as copy of the order dated 28.11.2023 preferred by the Executive Engineer wherein the detail of the payment has been provided to the Court, the same is taken on record and a copy thereof shall be provided to the learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri Ran Vijay Singh has also stated that the claim has already been considered and paid to the claimant/husband of the petitioner, therefore, the present contempt petition may be dismissed.

¶4In the wake of aforesaid development and having regard the letter dated 28.11.2023, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present contempt petition.

¶5Accordingly, the present contempt petition is dismissed.

¶6Notice is discharged.

¶7However, it is always open for the petitioner to approach the competent authority/ court of law, if she is having any other grievance. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 29.11.2023 RBS/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.