VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Nirmal v. Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Sultanpur and Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
30 November 2023
Bench
Shree Prakash Singhauthor
Case no.
6026/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 18 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6026 of 2023 Petitioner :- Nirmal Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Sultanpur And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.

¶1Heard Sri Sunil Kumar, learned counsel for the the petitioner, Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha, Sri Hemant Pandey, learned standing counsel for the State and perused the record.

¶2The instant petition has been filed with the following relief:- a. Direct the opposite party no.1 i.e. Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide the Revision No.C-202304000002009, Nirmal V/s Anil Kumar Verma and others under section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, relating to Village-Chorma, Pargana-Barausa, Tehsil-Jaisinghpur, District-Sultanpur, expeditiously within reasonable time as fixed by this Hon'ble court, in the interest of justice. b. Any other order, or direction, which this court deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case in favour of Petitioner be passed in the interest of justice. c. Allow the Petition with cost in favour of the Petitioner.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the matter is pending consideration and the same has still not been decided. He added that the interest of justice would sub-serve if this Hon'ble Court would be pleased to direct the opposite party no. 1 to decide the Revision No.C-202304000002009, Nirmal V/s Anil Kumar Verma and others within a stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court.

¶4The learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the contention aforesaid.

¶5In view of the aforesaid innocuous prayer, the Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya is hereby directed to decide the Revision No.C-202304000002009, Nirmal V/s Anil Kumar Verma and others under section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, relating to Village-Chorma, Pargana-Barausa, Tehsil-Jaisinghpur, District-Sultanpur, within a period of six months, from the date of certified copy is produced before it, in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to all the parties, if there is no legal impediment.

¶6The aforesaid order is subject to cooperation of the petitioner.

¶7Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 30.11.2023 Mayank High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.