- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 30 November 2023
- Bench
- Shree Prakash Singh
- Case no.
- 5621/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 18 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5621 of 2023 Petitioner :- Hanuman Singh And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Director Consolidation And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. Heard Sri Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Arvind Kumar learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the material placed on record. The instant application has been filed with a prayer to direct the opposite party no. 3, i.e., Consolidation Officer, Barabanki to decide the objection of the petitioners pending in Case No. 745, Hanuman and others Vs. State within a stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. The learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection to the contention aforesaid. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the opposite party no. 3, is hereby directed to decide the objection, if any, filed by the petitioners within period of six months from the date of certified copy is produced before it, in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to all the parties, if there is no legal impediment. The aforesaid order is subject to cooperation of the petitioner. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 30.11.2023 Anurag High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.