VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mohd. Tauseef v. State of U.P.Thru Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt.Lko. and Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
30 November 2023
Bench
Abdul Moinauthor
Case no.
WRIA 5558/2018

Judgment

Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5558 of 2018 Petitioner :- Mohd. Tauseef Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt.Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Kumar Srivastava,Gufran Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.Z. Siddiqui,Ajay Kumar,Prashant Kumar Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned State counsel for respondent nos.1 to 3, Shri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.4 as well as Shri Anoop Shukla holding brief of Shri A.Z. Siddiqui, learned counsel for respondent no.5.

¶2The instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondents to appoint the petitioner on the post of clerk under dying in harness rules. Further prayer is for issuing a direction to the respondent no.5 i.e. Committee of Management to forward the relevant papers to the respondent no.4 i.e. BSA, Hardoi for appointment of the petitioner on the post of Clerk.

¶3After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner states that subsequent to the filing of the petition, the Committee of Management had itself forwarded a proposal for appointment of the petitioner on a Class-IV post to the respondent no.4 vide proposal dated 12.03.2018, a copy of which has been filed as annexure SA-1 to the application for interim relief dated 03.02.2021, to the BSA, Hardoi who in turn has failed to pass a final order till date.

¶5It is prayed that as the matter has been pending for consideration before the respondent no.4 i.e. BSA, Hardoi, he may be directed to pass a final order on the proposal sent by respondent no.5 within a specified time.

¶6Considering that the matter for compassionate appointment of the petitioner for which a proposal has already been sent by the respondent no.5, vide letter dated 12.03.2018 to the BSA, Hardoi and the same is still pending at the end of BSA, Hardoi, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.4 to consider the proposal sent by the respondent no.5 pertaining to the compassionate appointment of the petitioner in accordance with law, the relevant rules and regulations and the government orders governing the subject provided there is no legal impediment. Let an order in this regard be passed within a period of six weeks from the date of a receipt of certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 30.11.2023 S. Shivhare High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.