- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 1 December 2023
- Bench
- Narendra Kumar Johari, Sangeeta Chandra
- Case no.
- 9161/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9161 of 2023 Petitioner :- Pravesh Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Girish Kumar Pandey,Sher Bahadur Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J.
¶1Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents.
¶2This petition has been filed with the following main prayers:- "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari thereby quashing the impugned First Information Report dated
30.06.2023 lodged by the opposite party no.4 in Case Crime No.0091 of 2023 Under Section 354(Ka) I.P.C. and Section 7/8 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Section 3(1)(Da)(Dha) SC/ST Act, police station Bewana District Ambedkar Nagar contained as Annexure No.1 to this writ petition.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite parties not to arrest the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned First Information Report dated 30.06.2023 lodged by the opposite party no.4 in Case Crime No.0091 of 2023 Under Section 354(Ka) I.P.C. and Section 7/8 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Section 3(1)(Da)(Dha) SC/ST Act, police station Bewana District Ambedkar Nagar contained as Annexure No.1 to this writ petition."
¶3It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the impugned FIR. He further submits that the elder brother of the petitioner is running a tea stall and petitioner sits along with his brother to help him. The complainant always comes in the said tea shop but he does not pay him money. When the petitioner and his brother tried to get the money for the tea that had been drunk by the informant he lodged the FIR.
¶4This Court has perused the impugned F.I.R. and prima facie finds that cognizable offence is being made out, hence finds no good ground to show interference as prayed in this petition.
¶5The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Order Date :- 1.12.2023 Arnima High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.