- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 4 December 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 10384/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10384 of 2023 Petitioner :- Mohammad Husain And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Janardan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for parties.
¶2Learned counsel for parties agree that there is a notice given to the petitioners for demolition under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and petitioners have filed their objection against the same. The said objections are pending before respondent no.4-Tehsildar, Tehsil Karnailganj, District Gonda.
¶3Learned Standing Counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha make a statement that any further action against the petitioners shall be subject to final orders passed by the Tehsildar. The said statement is taken on record.
¶4Accordingly, present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid statement. However, respondent no.4-Tehsildar, Tehsil Karnailganj, District Gonda is expected to decide the objections filed by petitioners expeditiously in accordance with law. He shall not grant any unnecessary adjournment including on the ground of strike of lawyers. [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 4.12.2023 Sachin High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.