Prem Chandra Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. and Others

Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8061 of 2023 Petitioner :- Prem Chandra Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amitabh Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J.

¶1Learned counsel for the petitioner moved an application No.IA/2/2023 seeking amendment in the memo of petition.

¶2For reasons mentioned in the affidavit filed in support of application, the application is allowed.

¶3Necessary incorporation be made during the course of the day.

¶4Learned A.G.A. has produced before this Court, the instructions sent by the Sub Inspector, P.S. Ruddauli, District-Ayodhya wherein it has been stated that the forensic science laboratories report dated 28.02.2023 states that the informant-Ashok had not signed the documents on the basis of which allegedly Shriram Transport Finance Company Limited, Branch Khairanpur had given a loan to one Umesh.

¶5It is evident from the said report that the documents showing Ashok Kumar as guarantor were not signed by him and were prepared by the employees of Shriram Transport Finance Company Limited, Branch-Khairanpur at the behest of Umesh Yadav, the borrower. Umesh Yadav has been taken into custody on 22.08.2023. Kaushal Kumar Singh @ Rajan Singh, Rahul Pandey, Branch Managers along with the petitioner, who is also a Branch Manager, were found to be involved in preparing of forge papers.

¶6Copy of the case diary has also been produced before this Court wherein the statement of the current Branch Manager Prateek Kumar Tiwari of Shriram Transport Finance Company Limited, Branch-Khairanpur Ruddauli is on record which shows the entire modus operandi adopted for defrauding the informant.

¶7This Court after having gone through the instructions directs the same to be kept on record. The copy of the case diary is returned to learned A.G.A.

¶8This Court does not find any good ground to show interference hence the petition stands dismissed. Order Date :- 4.12.2023 Saurabh Yadav/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench