- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 5 December 2023
- Bench
- Shree Prakash Singh
- Case no.
- 6092/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 18 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6092 of 2023 Petitioner :- Jokhan Lal Respondent :- Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vikas Maurya,Adarsh Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the material placed on record. The instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed with the prayer to direct the opposite party no. 1 to decide the Revision No. 621 of 2022, Computerized Case No. C202204000000621 filed under section 333 of the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act,1950, as early as possible Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the matter pertains to the year 2022, but, even after passing of one year, the proceeding of the revision has not been concluded as yet. After arguing at length, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the opposite party no. 1 to decide the revision within the stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this court. Considering aforesaid innocuous prayer, the opposite party no. 1 is directed to decide the Revision No. 621 of 2022, Computerized Case No. C202204000000621 filed under section 333 of the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act,1950, within a period of six months, from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before it, in accordance with law,after affording opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment. The aforesaid order is subject to cooperation of the petitioner. With the aforesaid observation, the instant petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 5.12.2023 AKS High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.