Mohd. Faheem and Anr v. State of U.P. and Anr

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2048 of 2021 Applicant :- Mohd. Faheem And Anr. Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Sachida Nand,Jyoti Rajpoot,Mohd.Rizwan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶1Case called out. Nobody is present on behalf of the applicant. Smt. Parul Kant, the learned AGA is present.

¶2Although the applicant was granted interim anticipatory bail by means of an order dated 22.02.2021, when the case was listed on 13.06.2022, adjournment was sought on behalf of the applicant and the Court had specifically observed that in case adjournment is sought on the next date fixed, the interim order granted earlier will not be extended because it is obligatory on the part of the Court to decide an anticipatory bail application within a period of one month from the date of filing of the application.

¶3As nobody has appeared on behalf of the applicant on the past several dates and today also nobody is present to press the application and the interim order granted to the applicant earlier already lapsed w.e.f. 20.06.2022, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 5.12.2023 Pradeep/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench