- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 7 December 2023
- Bench
- Rajnish Kumar
- Case no.
- 1088/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1088 of 2023 Petitioner :- Pravesh Respondent :- Board Of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow Thru. Member Judicial And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hairdaya Narain Tiwari,Ankit Kumar Pandey,Atul Tiwari,Hari Mangal Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. Sri S.P. Singh learned Additional Chief Standing counsel raises a preliminary objection that the petition has been filed challenging the order dated 13.04.2023 passed in Revision no.1682 of 2017 (Lakshman vs Madhavram) by respondent no.1/Board of Revenue but without impleading the respondent of the said revision. Therefore, this petition is not maintainable. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh after impleading all necessary parties and annexing the relevant documents including the revision. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. As prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner, office is directed to return certified copies of the documents annexed with the petition to learned counsel for the petitioner as per rules after keeping photocopies of the same on record. (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Order Date :- 7.12.2023 Harshita High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.