- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 7 December 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Shree Prakash Singh
- Case no.
- WRIC 10562/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10562 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rajesh Kashyap Respondent :- District Magistrate , Hardoi And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- D.K. Singh Chauhan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State.
¶2Present writ petition is filed by petitioner claiming that he has moved a representation under Section 67(5) of U.P. Revenue Code Rules before the respondent no.2 Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sandila, Hardoi.
¶3Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no.2 considers and decides the aforesaid representation in a time bound manner.
¶4Looking into the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no.2 Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sandila, Hardoi is directed to consider and decide the representation of petitioner, in accordance with law, by a reasoned and speaking order, after hearing all the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible say within a period of one week from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before him.
¶5With the aforesaid directions, present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 7.12.2023 Arti/- [Shree Prakash Singh,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.