VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Harnand Kumar Agarwal v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. and Others

Dismissed on merits/Rejected
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
7 December 2023
Bench
Narendra Kumar Johari, Sangeeta Chandra
Case no.
9299/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9299 of 2023 Petitioner :- Harnand Kumar Agarwal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Nishad,Anjani Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. This petition has been filed with the following main prayer"- "To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari thereby quashing the impugned the First Information Report dated 8-7-2023 filed by opposite party no.6 against the petitioners bearing case crime no.0206/2023 under section 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 506 of the I.P.C. Police Station Vajeerganj, District Lucknow Western Commissionerate Lucknow U.P. The copy of first information report dated 8-7-2023 is being annexed herewith as annexure no.1 to this writ petition." It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the co-accused have already been granted interim protection by this Court. A copy of the order passed in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.8292 of 2023: Smt. Kamla Goyal and others, has been filed as annexure-10 to the petition. This Court has perused the interim order dated

03.11.2023 granted to the co-accused. Paragraph-3 of the same is quoted hereinbelow:- "3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners no. 1 and 2 are the bonafide purchasers and the petitioners no. 3 and 4 are the witnesses to the sale deed executed by One Harnand Kumar Agrawal. A perusal of the F.I.R. would show that the dispute is Civil in nature relating to the possession of the property in between Harnand Kumar Agrawal and Tarachandra Agarwal and the informant and the petitioners have been falsely roped in. The dispute is civil in nature and has been tried to be given a criminal colour." It is evident that the petitioners, who had approached this Court in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.8292 of 2023: Smt. Kamla Goyal and others Vs. State of U.P. and others, stood at a different footing than the petitioner herein, who is a seller. After having examined the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned F.I.R., we are of the opinion that the impugned F.I.R. discloses cognizable offence by the petitioner, hence, no interference is called for by this Court in its extraordinary power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing of the F.I.R. or for grant of any interim relief to the petitioner and accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 7.12.2023 Rahul High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.