- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 7 December 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Shree Prakash Singh
- Case no.
- WRIC 10624/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10624 of 2023 Petitioner :- M/S S.G. Constructions Thru. Prop. Sayyada Hasnain Lko Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Institutional Finance Govt. Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Namit Sharma Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri Amit Kumar Dwivedi, Advocate, who has appeared on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 3 - Nagar Nigam, Lucknow. There is a full agreement at the bar that the matter stands squarely covered by the judgement of this Court delivered in the case of Tajveer Singh and others vs. State of U.P. and others, 1997 (2) AWC 1029. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances as brought on record, the opposite parties are directed to give effect to the judgment of this Court in the case of Tajveer Singh and others (supra). It is further provided that the petitioner will not be required to pay stamp duty except in accordance with Article 57 of the Schedule 1-B of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. This order will apply only in respect of the security amount/security bond. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (Shree Prakash Singh, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 7.12.2023 Arjun/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.