VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Saleem v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Civil Secrt. Lko. and 7 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
7 December 2023
Bench
Alok Mathurauthor
Case no.
1129/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 17 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1129 of 2023 Petitioner :- Saleem Respondent :- State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Civil Secrt. Lko. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Irfan Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Alok Mathur, J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for State -respondents while notice on behalf of Gaon Sabha-respondent No.4 has been accepted by Sri Dilip Kumar Pandey.

¶2In light of the proposed order, notices to private respondents are dispensed with.

¶3Petitioner has approached this court seeking a direction to opposite parties No.2 to 3 for removal of illegal encroachment, obstruction and construction from the common public benefit of the land of Khasra No. 224 situated in Gram Sabha Karundi, Tehsil-Bakshi Ka Talab, Lucknow, expeditiously.

¶4Learned counsel for petitioner submits that aforesaid land is for common public benefit belonging to the Gaon Sabha and is recorded as such in the revenue records.

¶5It is further submitted that private respondents are bhumafia and land grabbers and have made encroachment over the said land.

¶6Learned Standing Counsel, on the other hand, has submitted that petitioner has efficacious remedy under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 where after obtaining report of Revenue Inspector and issuing notices to the alleged encroachers, effective orders for removal of the alleged encroachments as well as levy of penalty can be passed in case the allegations are found correct.

¶7Learned counsel for petitioner at this stage submits that petitioner may be given liberty to move an application under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 before the competent authority.

¶8Accordingly, without entering into merits of the case, the writ petition, is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move an application before the competent authority and in case such an application is made the said authority is directed to proceed to consider and decide the same expeditiously in accordance with law. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 7.12.2023 RKM. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.