- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 7 December 2023
- Bench
- Rajnish Kumar
- Case no.
- 5891/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5891 of 2023 Petitioner :- Shamshul Huda @ Raju Respondent :- Civil Judge, Junior Division, Balrampur And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishvajeet Singh,Pratibha Agnihotri Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. Supplementary affidavit filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner is taken on record. Ms. Pratibha Agnihotri learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent nos.2 and 3 have filed Regular Suit no.243 of 2020 for permanent injunction along with an application for interim injunction. The interim injunction has been granted in favour of the respondent nos.2 and 3, therefore, they are not interested in getting the suit decided and general dates are being fixed. Perusal of the order sheet annexed by the petitioner along with the petition as well as supplementary affidavit does not indicate that the general dates are being fixed. Therefore, the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is misconceived and not tenable, therefore, at this stage, no direction can be issued for disposal of the suit. The petition is dismissed. (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Order Date :- 7.12.2023 Harshita High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.