VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Hari Prashad v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow and Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
7 December 2023
Bench
Shree Prakash Singhauthor
Case no.
6119/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 18 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6119 of 2023 Petitioner :- Hari Prashad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sheel Nidhi Shukla,Shiv Darshan Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.

¶1At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she may be permitted to implead the Sub-Divisional Officer as a party in the array of the opposite parties.

¶2The learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the contention aforesaid.

¶3In view of the aforesaid, counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mohanlal Ganj, District-Lucknow, as opposite party no. 7 in the array of opposite parties, during course of the day.

¶4Heard Smt Sheel Nidhi Shukla, learned counsel for the the petitioner, Sri Hemant Pandey, learned standing counsel for the State and perused the record.

¶5The instant petition has been filed with the following reliefs:- I-Issue an order or direction commanding to the trial court of S.D.M-Tahseel Mohanlal Ganj, District - Lucknow disposed the case of Hariprashad Vs Tedhe and ors, Computer Case No-T202110460318499, under section 116 U.P land revenue Code 2006 without any delay in the stipulated period. II-Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble court may deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case in the favour of the petitioner.

¶6The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the matter is pending consideration and the same has still not been decided. She added that the interest of justice would sub-serve if this Hon'ble Court would be pleased to direct the opposite party no. 7 to decide the case of (Hariprashad Vs Tedhe and ors), Computer Case No-T202110460318499, under section 116 U.P land revenue Code 2006 within a stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court.

¶7The learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the contention aforesaid.

¶8In view of the aforesaid innocuous prayer, the S.D.M-Tahseel Mohanlal Ganj, District - Lucknow is hereby directed to decide case of (Hariprashad Vs Tedhe and ors), Computer Case No-T202110460318499, under section 116 U.P land revenue Code 2006 within a period of six months, from the date of certified copy is produced before it, in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to all the parties, if there is no legal impediment.

¶9The aforesaid order is subject to cooperation of the petitioner.

¶10Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 7.12.2023 Mayank High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.