VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shivshankar Dixit v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko and Others

Dismissed on merits/Rejected
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
8 December 2023
Bench
Narendra Kumar Johari, Sangeeta Chandra
Case no.
8769/2023

Judgment

Court No. -10 Case :-CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. -8769 of 2023 Petitioner :-Shivshankar Dixit Respondent :-State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko And Others Counsel for Petitioner :-Ajmal Khan,Javed Khan Counsel for Respondent :-G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents. This petition has been filed praying the following reliefs:-

(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari thereby quashing the impugned first information dated

26.4.2022 vide case crime no. 193 of 2022 under Section 409 IP.C., lodged at Police Station-Mishrit, District-Sitapur as contained in Annexure-1 to this writ petition.

(b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 2 and 3 not to harass, detain or prosecute the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned F.I.R. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is cashier and he had no role to play in forging the documents. His duty is only to make payments of bills that are presented to him. This Court has also perused the F.I.R. instructions that have been sent by the Inspector, Prevention of Corruption Organization, Lucknow Region, Lucknow and duly signed by the Prosecution Officer of the said Organization wherein it has been stated that the petitioner, who was working as a cashier was responsible for making payments of bills that were presented to him but he made less payment than was mentioned in the bill and gave receipts that were of a greater amount as mentioned in bill although payment was done of lesser amount . The Court having perused the impugned F.I.R. finds that Inspector/ Investigating Officer deputed for conducting investigation by Prevention of Corruption Organization, Lucknow has also been involved in the forging of the documents and in removing relevant evidence and therefore, he has been implicated, this Court finds no ground to show interference. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Order Date :- 8.12.2023 Anuj Singh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.