VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lucknow and Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
7 December 2023
Bench
Shree Prakash Singhauthor
Case no.
6136/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 18 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6136 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sachindra Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.

¶1Matter is being decided at admission stage, hence notices to opposite parties no. 4 to 8 are hereby dispensed with.

¶2Heard Sri Sachindra Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha and perused the record.

¶3Instant petition has been filed with following reliefs:- A. To set aside the judgment and order dated 29.05.2023 passed by chief Revenue officer Ayodhya in case no. 1415/2023 computer case no. D202304230001415 U/S-30(2) U. P. Revenue code-2006 (Shiv Shankar vs Rakesh Kumar and others) contained in annexure no.1 to this petition. B. To direct the chief Revenue officer Ayodhya to hear and decide the case no. 1415/2023 computer case no. D202304230001415 U/S-30(2) U. P. Revenue code-2006 (Shiv Shankar vs Rakesh Kumar and others) on merit. C. Any other such order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the nature and circumstances of the case. D. To award the cost of petition.

¶4Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner purchased some part of the land from Khata Sankhya 80 and the share of the vendor was sold out to the petitioner on the basis of an amicable settlement in between the parties. He added that the private respondent no. 4 moved the case under section 30 (2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 before the Chief Revenue Officer, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya on 26.04.2023 and thereafter, without hearing the petitioner, an exparte interim order was granted on 29.05.2023 and therefore, the interest of petitioner is being badly affected.

¶5After the aforesaid argument of learned counsel for the petitioner confined his argument to the effect that interest of justice would be sub-served if, the Chief Revenue Officer, Ayodhya is directed to conclude the Case No. 1415 of 2023 (Shiv Shankar vs Rakesh Kumar & Others) within stipulated period of time.

¶6Learned standing counsel for the State as well as Gaon Sabha have no objection to the contentions aforesaid.

¶7In view of the aforesaid submissions, the Chief Revenue Officer, Ayodhya, District-Ayodhya is hereby directed the Case No. 1415 of 2023 computer case no. D202304230001415 U/S-30(2) U. P. Revenue code-2006 (Shiv Shankar vs Rakesh Kumar and others) within period of four months, from the date of certified copy is produced before it, in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to all the parties, if there is no legal impediment.

¶8The aforesaid order is subject to cooperation of the petitioner.

¶9Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 7.12.2023 Mayank High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.