- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 8 December 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 10657/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10657 of 2023 Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Yadav And Others Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Road Transport And Highways, New Delhi And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- In Person,Ajay Pratap Singh Vatsa,In Person Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.,Sarvesh Kumar Dubey Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. Petitioners have approached this Court claiming that they were provided Gata Nos. 551 and part of Gata No.552 for construction purposes in earlier chakbandi proceedings and they raised construction over the same and now the same are being acquired but even cost of constructions, for the construction raised by the petitioners, have not been provided to the petitioners. Learned Standing Counsel on instructions states that the Competent Authority i.e. Respondent No.5 shall consider and expeditiously decide the claim of the petitioner in accordance with law. In the given circumstances, the petitioner is permitted to move representation before the Respondent No.5 within a period of one week annexing all the relevant papers alongwith copy of this order, who shall decide the same expeditiously, say within a period of four weeks by passing a speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. . [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 8.12.2023 S. Kumar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.