Brijesh Kumar Srivastava v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Transport, Lko. and Others

Court No. - 20 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9381 of 2023 Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Transport, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhaskar Misra,Lovekush Pandey,Manpreet Singh,Rahul Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties.

¶2Petition has been filed seeking the following relief: "(i) To issue a writ, direction, or order in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties by providing the benefit of ACP on completing of 26 of service to the petitioner the pay grade should be upgraded from Rs.4200/- to 4600/-.

(ii) To issue a writ, direction, or order in the nature of Mandamus directing the opposite party no.3 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 20.07.23 contain as Annexure No.6 to the writ petition.

(iii) To issue any such other writ, direction, or order as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper."

¶3For the aforesaid grievance, petitioner has already submitted a representation but seeks liberty to file fresh representation before competent authority. At present learned counsel for petitioner restricts his prayer for a final decision with regard to same.

¶4Considering innocuous prayer being made by learned counsel for petitioner and without entering into the merits of the case petitioner is granted liberty to file a fresh representation before competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be considered and decided by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.

¶5With the aforesaid observation, petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 11.12.2023 Subodh/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench