Laxmi and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Collector , Barabanki and Others

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10668 of 2023 Petitioner :- Laxmi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Collector , Barabanki And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amitesh Pratap Singh,Laxmi Narayan Gupta,Naveen Kumar Singh,Shesh Ram Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶1At the outset, learned counsel for petitioners prays for and is granted leave to implead Chief Development Officer, Barabanki as respondent no.5 during course of the day.

¶2Heard learned counsel for parties.

¶3Petitioners have approached this Court claiming that they were never granted any benefit under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojna. They claim that it was informed that the said benefit is already given to them in the year 2014.

¶4Learned counsel for petitioners states that the said amount was never transferred in the accounts of petitioners, but the same was transferred in some third party's account. He further submits that grievance of petitioners would be sufficiently met in case representation of petitioners for the said purposes is considered and decided in a time bound manner.

¶5Learned counsel for respondents have no objection to the same.

¶6In view thereof, petitioners are permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.5-Chief Development Officer, Barabanki, raising all their grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents in support of their claim within a period of two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order.

¶7In case such a representation is moved by petitioners, respondent no.5 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date, a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him.

¶8It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law.

¶9With the aforesaid directions, present writ petition is disposed of. [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 11.12.2023 Sachin High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench