Smt. Renuka Ram v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Civil Sectt. Lko and Others

Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9347 of 2023 Petitioner :- Smt. Renuka Ram Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Civil Sectt. Lko And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shrawan Kumar,Shrawan Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J.

(1) Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A. who appears for the Opposite party nos.1, 2 & 3.

(2) This petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following prayers:- "i. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari to quash the impugned First Information Report dated

27.11.2023 so far in respect of the petitioner lodged by the Opposite party no.4 in Case Crime No.154 of 2023, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C. & 7/13 Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, at Police Station Kotwali Kaiserbagh, District (Lucknow Madhya), Commissionerate Lucknow, contained in Annexure No.1 to the writ petition. ii. issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding / directing the opposite parties not to arrest the petitioner in case crime No. 154 of 2023 U/S 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C. & 7/13 prevention of Corruption Act 1988 at Police Station Kotwali Kaiserbagh (Lucknow Madhya) Commissionerate Lucknow during pendency of the writ petition. iii. issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding / directing the opposite parties to direct the opposite party No 1 to initiate the fair and proper investigation in case crime No. 154 of 2023 U/S 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C. & 7/13 prevention of Corruption Act 1988 at Police Station Kotwali Kaiserbagh (Lucknow Madhya) Commissionerate Lucknow."

(3) It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been working as an Accountant since 1998 in the Treasury and she has been falsely implicated in the impugned F.I.R. on the basis of some Inquiry conducted with regard to pension that was being disbursed only on the orders of the Drawing Disbursement Authority by the petitioner.

(4) This Court has perused the F.I.R. alongwith Fact Finding Report on the basis of complaint which had alleged Irregularities/Embezzlement with the active connivance of the petitioner of public money.

(5) Learned A.G.A. has also produced before this Court the Enquiry Report on the basis of which the impugned F.I.R. was lodged and at Page no.8 of the same a detailed reference has been made as to how the petitioner managed to get pension released of her close relatives namely Vishal, Smt. Gulbhi, Smt. Ramrati and others to the tune of several lacs of rupees, a total amount of which has been calculated as 1,42,39,643/-.

(6) This Court has perused the F.I.R. and finds no good ground to show interference in the matter.

(7) The writ petition stands dismissed. Order Date :- 11.12.2023 N.PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench