- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 12 December 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 10575/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10575 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rajendra Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Civil Secrt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha. Petitioner has approached this court claiming that he was awarded an patta in the year 2010 but till date possession of the same has not been provided to him. It appears that concerned S.D.M. has also passed administrative orders that action be taken in accordance with law. Learned Standing Counsel on instruction states that there is a dispute with regard to validity of patta of the petitioner. In the given circumstances, petitioner is permitted to make a detail representation before the respondent no. 3-S.D.M., Akbarpur, district Ambedkar Nagar within a period of two weeks from today alongwith certified copy of this order. Respondent no. 3 shall consider and decide the representation regarding validity of patta claimed by the petitioner. In case, the S.D.M. finds that there is a patta in favour of the petitioner, he shall do the needful and take the matter to a logical conclusion unless there is any legal impediment. Writ petition is disposed of. (Manish Kumar,J) (Vivek Chaudhary,J) Order Date :- 12.12.2023 Ashish High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.