- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 12 December 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 10742/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10742 of 2023 Petitioner :- Manju Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lucknow And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- K.K. Singh,Haroon Rasheed,Shravan Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Zafar Aziz Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard Shri K.K.Singh, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Zafar Aziz learned counsel for respondent no.3 and learned standing counsel for State. Present writ petition is filed by petitioner for a mandamus that respondent no.2 may be directed to decide the appeal/representation dated 10.07.2019 which is filed against order passed by respondent no.3 by which claim of petitioner under 'Mukhyamantri Kisan Evam Sarvhit Bima Yojna is rejected. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would be sufficiently met in case aforesaid appeal/representation of petitioner is considered and decided in a time bound manner. Learned counsel for respondents have no objection to the same. In view thereof, without entering into the merits of the case, writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2 District Magistrate, Barabanki/President, District Level Committee, Mukhyamantri Kisan Evam Sarvhit Bima Yojna, to decide the aforesaid appeal/representation of petitioner, in accordance with law, by a reasoned and speaking order, within period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before him. . [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 12.12.2023/S. Kumar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.