- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 12 December 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 10756/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10756 of 2023 Petitioner :- Jagdish Kumar Kashyap Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Fisheries U.P. Civil Secrt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satyendra Kumar Tiwari,Akhilesh Singh Chauhan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Dilip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for respondent Gaon Sabha and learned Standing Counsel for State.
¶2Present writ petition is filed by petitioner praying that respondent no.3 District Magistrate, Hardoi may be directed to decide the Appeal dated 08.08.2023 filed by petitioner for cancellation of lease dated 11.07.2023 granted in favour of respondent no.7.
¶3Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no.3 considers and decides the aforesaid appeal in a time bound manner.
¶4Looking into the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no.3 District Magistrate, Hardoi is directed to proceed with the Appeal dated 08.08.2023 and decide the same in accordance with law, by a reasoned and speaking order, after hearing all the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible say within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before him.
¶5With the aforesaid directions, present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 12.12.2023 Arti/- [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.