- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 12 December 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 10746/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10746 of 2023 Petitioner :- M/S Aditya Builder Thru. Proprietor Aditya Kumar Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Nagar Vikas Civil Secrt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Shravan Kumar Verma,Uttam Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Daya Shanker Tripathi,Namit Sharma Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel and Sri Daya Shanker Tripathi, learned counsel for Nagar Nigam. A similar matter has already been disposed of vide judgment dated 19.11.2015 in W.P. No. 10743(MB) of 2015, M/s Shatkashi Construction Company v. State of U.P. and others, which is not disputed by the learned counsel for the Nagar Nigam. Accordingly, this matter is also covered by the decision in the case of Tajveer Singh v. State of U.P. and others [1997 ALJ 285]. The petitioner shall also be entitled to the same benefits. Writ petition stands disposed of with the said directions. . [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 12.12.2023 S. Kumar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.