VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Khaki Saran Singh v. Anandkar Pandey, Deputy Director of Edu. Secondary, Faizabad and Another

Dismissed on merits/Rejected
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
12 December 2023
Bench
Rajesh Singh Chauhanauthor
Case no.
3388/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 4 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3388 of 2023 Applicant :- Khaki Saran Singh Opposite Party :- Anandkar Pandey, Deputy Director Of Edu. Secondary, Faizabad And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vinayak Saxena, learned Standing Counsel.

¶2Sri Vinayak Saxena has drawn attention of this Court towards the affidavit of compliance dated 09.11.2023 showing Annexure No. 2 which is an order dated 06.11.2023 passed by Deputy Director of Education (secondary), 9th Division, Ayodhya, addressing to the District Inspector of Schools, Ayodhya indicating therein that the interim pension of Rs. 28,840/- has been sanctioned to the petitioner. Sri Saxena has further submitted that after completing the required exercise, the petitioner may also be paid his regular pension.

¶3Be that as it may, since he order dated 06.11.2023 (supra) has been passed, therefore, there is no purpose to keep this contempt petition pending any longer.

¶4Accordingly, the instant contempt petition is dismissed.

¶5Notices, if any, stand discharged.

¶6However, it is expected that the interim pension shall be created in the account of the petitioner in terms of the order of Writ Court as well as the order dated 06.11.2023 (supra) with expedition, preferably, within a period of one month. It is also expected that in terms of the order of Writ Court, the petitioner shall also be paid the arrears of pension from the date of his retirement. Further, as soon as the other required formalities are completed, the petitioner shall be paid his regular pension in terms of the order of Writ Court, failing which, the liberty is given to the petitioner to file an application seeking revival of the present contempt petition and if such application is filed. the contempt petition is revived and it is found that the order of the Writ Court has not been complied with, any coercive order may be passed against the opposite parties on such application. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 12.12.2023 kkv/ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.