Saroj Kumar Mukherjee v. Union of India Thru. Secy. Deptt. of Telecommunication Ministry of Communications and 2 Others

Court No. - 8 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9448 of 2023 Petitioner :- Saroj Kumar Mukherjee Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Telecommunication Ministry Of Communications And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shashank Singh,Anil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Krishna Chandra Srivastava Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Anand Dwivedi, learned counsel for Union of India, and Sri Siddharth Tripathi holding brief of Sri Krishna Chandra Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.3.

¶2With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is finally disposed off.

¶3Instant writ petition has been filed by a retired employee of ITI praying for payment of privileged leave encashment.

¶4Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.3 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsels for the respondents have no objection.

¶5In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.3 then respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of four weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order.

¶6It is also provided that in case any amount is found admissible to the petitioner then the same would also be paid to the petitioner.

¶7With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off.

¶8It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 13.12.2023 akverma High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench