VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mohd. Salim @ Mohd. Salim Qureshi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P. and Another

Dismissed on merits/Rejected
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
13 December 2023
Bench
Karunesh Singh Pawarauthor
Case no.
9419/2023

Judgment

Court No. -13 Case :-CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. -9419 of 2023 Petitioner :-Mohd. Salim @ Mohd. Salim Qureshi Respondent :-State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :-Vinod Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :-G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned AGA for the State. Notices to respondent no. 2 are dispensed with in view of the proposed order. By this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief:-"Issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the order dated 28.09.2022 passed in criminal revision no. 71/2022 (Mohd. Salim and others versus State of U.P. and another) by learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (N.D.P.S. Act), Court No. 10, Barabanki as well as quash the summoning order dated 22.03.2022 passed under section 147, 323, 504, 452, 376D IPC on the basis of final report no. 289/2021 by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 19, Barabanki in the case of 'Sunita Soni versus Mohd. Salim and others' relating case crime no. 294/2017 under section 147, 323, 504, 452, 506, 376D, 394 IPC registered at Police Station Safdarganj, District-Barabanki contained as Annexure No. 1 & 2 to this petition in the interest of justice." Perused the record. Perusal of the impugned summoning order dated 22.03.2022 passed by the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 19 Barabanki, it appears that an FIR through an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. was registered at the concerned police station as case crime No. 294/2017, under Sections 147/323/504/506/376-D/392 IPC in which after investigation, final report was filed. Learned court below after considering the statements of the prosecutrix under Section 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. has rejected the final report and summoned the accused persons in a State case. The relevant part of the order dated 22.03.2022 is extracted below:-

अवललकननयहहकककवववचननकवअननकम.

ममपचनरससखयन-2

कदननसककत26.09.2017

कलपनकडतनदनरनअपनव

बयननअनतररतधनरन-161 'द.प.सस.

ममकथनककयनहहकक"18

जनलनई2017

कलसमय7.30

बजवशनमकल

पनरथरननघरममअकवलनथन।रनसवकवहनरहनववनलवमल०सलनमपनतरमजननन,

इमरननपनतसलनम,

सलमननपनत

सलनमवदलअजनतवयककरजसकनननमपतननहहमनललममनसहममकपडनबनसधवहहएहनथममलनत-

डणडडकवसनथ

घरममअचननकघनसआयवऔरमनस,

बहनककभदन-

भदनरनरलयनसदवतवहहएबवडपरकररनकदयनकपडवभनफनडव

औरसककनपरहनथभनलरनयनऔरकनरनककआजतनमघरममअकवलनहलतनमहनरवपकतनवमनझसवदनशमननकक

थनआजममकनकमलनहहहमतनमहनरनइजजतखरनबकरदवरव।हनथ,

पहरकलदबनकरपकडरलयनऔरमनसहकल

भनदबनकदयनबललवशलरमचननवपरजननसवमनरनवककधमककदवनवलरव।पनरथरननकवपवशनबममभनहनथडनल

कदयनथन।पनरथननकवशलररनलकरनवपररलरनतमनमललरइकटनहलरयवथव।उकललरपनरथरननकवरलवमम

पहनवहहईसलनवककचहनवमसरलसलत16

गनमसलनमनवरलवसवनलचकरछननरलयनऔरजनतव-

जनतवधमककभन

दवतवरयनककककसनथनननपनरलसममबतनओरनतलजननसवखतमकरदवरम।तथनसन०डन०पचनरससखयन-8,

कदननसककत10.10.2017

ममपनकडतनदनरनअपनवरयननअनतररतधनरन-164 द.प.स.

ममकथनककयनहहकक "

इसनवरर18

जनलनईलमशनम7.30

बजवसव8.00

बजवकवबनचकनसमयथन।ममघरममउससमयअकवलन

भन।पनसचललरसलनम, इमरनन,

सलमननवदलललरडनवकपडनमनसहपरबनसधरखनथनउनकलममनहहजननतन

यहपनसचडललरएकनएकमवरवघरममघनसआयव।दलललरडनवहनथडममडणडनरलयनथन।ममनवपलसछनकयडआयवहल

मवरवपकतघरममनहहहमबनतकरननइसपरएकदमसवयवललररनदनरनदनरनरलयनदवनवलरवऔरखहचनतननन

करनवलरवऔरजबरदसतनजमननपररलटनकदयनऔरमवरवकपडवफनडकदयवसलनमनवकहनसककइसकक इजजत,

खरनबकरल।सलनमनवकहनकककपतनजनपतनचलजनयमरनइजजतमतखरनबकरल।ममकचलनईतल

मवरनमनसहबसदकरकदयनऔरकहनककदलसरनतरहसवइजजतखनरनबकरलऔरसभनललरडनवमवरवसतनदबनयव

औरसभननननचमवरवरनपनसरपरहनथडनलनऔरशरनरपरननचन।मवरवहनथपकडरखवथवऔररलनमनदवनचन

रजससवमवरवहनथवरदरनपरकनशननपडरयव।मवरनजनसघवपनछवसवललरडनवपकडरखनथनकचलननवपरमवरवदल-

तननमनरवथव।मवरवशलरपरमलहलववनलवआयवथव।यहललरमवरनसलनवककचहनवमसरलसलत3

लनकरटकलरलवसव

कनकनलवऔरजनतवजनतवधमककभनदनककककसनकलबतनयनतलजननसवमनरवदमरव।उपरलकबयननसवपनकडतन

दनरनघटननकनसमथरनककयनहह,

ककनतनकवववचकदनरनअनयचशचमनदरवनहकलतरजनहदवकरमनमलवमम

असकतमररपलटरपवकरतकरदनरयनहहजबककपनकडतनकवकवरदयमनशलरणकनअपरनधकनररतककयनरयनहह

तथनकनररत

पनकडतनमकहलनकवकवरदबयननसवथकदमनमलवककसवयसपनकषहलतनहहअतअकभयनकरणकल

तलबककयनजननननयनयलकचलहलरन।अततमनमलवकवतथयएवसपरररधयनककदकषरतरखतवहहएअकभयनकरण

कलतलबककयवजननवयनआधनरपयनरपहहवअसकतमररपलटरकनरसतककयवजननवयलगधहह। आदवश

तदननसनरनयनयनलयममपवकरतअपरनधससखयन-294/2017

ममपसतनततअसकतमररपलटरससखयन-24/2018

कदननसककत12.02.2019

कनरसतककजनतनहह।कवपकनरणमन०सतनम,

इमरननसलभनत।धनरन-147 323, 504, 452, 376 डन,

भन०८०सस०कवअनतररततलबककयनजनतनहह।यहभनमलनसटवटकहसकवरपमम

चलवरन।पतनवलनवनसतवहनरजरनअकभयनकरणकदननसक25.04.2022

कलपवशहल।" Against the order dated 22.03.2022, a revision was filed. Learned Revisinoal Court has not found any illegality or impropriety in the order passed by the court below and as such, the revision has also been dismissed. On due consideration to the law laid down by this Court in the case of "Pakhandu v. State of U.P., 2001 SCC OnLine All 967" I am of the opinion that judgment of the court below does not suffer from any illegality/impropriety, likewise judgment of the Revisional Court also does not call for any interference; statements of the prosecutrix under section 161 Cr.P.C. and 164 Cr.P.C. are intact and prima facie commission of offence under the aforesaid sections appears to have been made out. No interference is required in the order of the court below as well as in the order of the Revisional Court and accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 13.12.2023 R.C. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.