VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Bharat Jan Gaurav Manch, Thru. Its Chairman / Chief Trustee Indresh Kumar Shukla v. Arun Kumar, the Distt. Basic Edu. Officer Lko. and Another

Dismissed on merits/Rejected
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
13 December 2023
Bench
Rajesh Singh Chauhanauthor
Case no.
3440/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 4 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3440 of 2023 Applicant :- Bharat Jan Gaurav Manch, Thru. Its Chairman / Chief Trustee Indresh Kumar Shukla Opposite Party :- Arun Kumar, The Distt. Basic Edu. Officer Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Akash Dikshit Counsel for Opposite Party :- Pradeep Tiwari Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶1Heard.

¶2This Court has passed order dated 16.11.2023 which reads as under : "1. Heard Sri Akash Dixit, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Pradeep Tiwari, learned counsel for the B.S.A., Lucknow.

¶2This Court has passed order dated 10.10.2023 which reads as under : "1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶2Attention has been drawn towards order of this Court passed in Public Interest Litigation (PIL) Civil No.15633 of 2021 (Bharat Jan Gaurav Manch through its Chairman vs. State of U.P. & others) whereby the aforesaid Public Litigation Petition was disposed of finally on the instructions so received by the learned Standing Counsel to the effect that the building of the School in question is vacant and it can be demolished. When no appropriate exercise has been carried out pursuant to the order of this Court passed in the aforesaid Public Interest Litigation dated 18.08.2021, the petitioner filed the contempt petition bearing Contempt Application (Civil) No.2004 of 2021 (Bharat Jan Gaurav Manch through its Chairman vs. Vijay Pratap Singh, District Basic Education Officer, Lucknow) which was decided finally on 02.03.2023 considering the submission opposite party that the order has been complied with and the Primary School in question has been shifted to some other place.

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner has further drawn attention of this Court towards para-14 of the contempt petition wherein he has categorically indicated that the same building is again being utilized by the Primary School with effect from 03.07.2023 and the classes have been started in such building again.

¶4The matter requires consideration.

¶5Let notices be issued to opposite party Nos.1 & 2 returnable at an early date, for which, necessary steps be taken within a week.

¶6Office to proceed accordingly.

¶7List this case on 16.11.2023 within to ten cases.

¶8By that date, the opposite party Nos.1 & 2 shall explain as to why the compliance of order dated 18.08.2021 passed by this Court in Public Interest Litigation (PIL) Civil No.15633 of 2021 has not been done in its letter and spirit."

¶3Sri Pradeep Tiwari, learned counsel for the B.S.A. has stated on the basis of instructions that the safety and security of the children is paramount consideration and that may not be compromised. He has stated that he may be given some reasonable time to file affidavit of compliance making compliance of the order of the writ court in its letter and spirit.

¶4Let the affidavit of compliance be filed within three weeks.

¶5List on 13.12.2023.

¶6On or before 13.12.2023 the B.S.A., Lucknow namely Sri Arun Kumar shall file affidavit of compliance making compliance of the order of the writ court in its letter and spirit failing which he shall appear in person on the next date.

¶7When the case is next listed name of Sri Pradeep Tiwari shall be shown as counsel for the opposite party."

¶3Sri Pradeep Tiwari, learned counsel for the opposite party has filed affidavit of compliance by submitting that the order of writ court has been complied with in its letter and spirit and recital to this effect has been given in para 11 of the affidavit of compliance.

¶4This is a serious issue but considering the submission of learned counsel for the opposite party that the order of the writ court has been complied with in its letter and spirit, the contempt petition is dismissed.

¶5Notices discharged.

¶6However, it is always open for the petitioner to file any application for revival of the contempt petition, if the order of the writ court is again flouted and if such application is filed and contempt petition is revived any coercive order may be passed against the opposite party. . [Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.] Order Date :- 13.12.2023 Om High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.