- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 14 December 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 10566/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10566 of 2023 Petitioner :- Gulfam Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Khadya Suraksha Evam Aushadhi Vibhag, Lucknow And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar,Chandra Prakash Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Upendra Singh Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and Shri Niwas Bajpayee, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3. Petitioner has approached this Court for a mandamus claiming that he has having a license to run the shop for meat, meat products and poultry which is valid from 03.06.2023 to
02.06.2024 but the respondent nos. 3 and 4 namely Executive Officer, Nagar Palika, Sitapur and S.H.O. concerned are interfering him in running his shop. On instructions, learned counsel for the Nagar Palika Parishad and learned Standing Counsel state that respondent nos. 3 and 4 are not interfering in running of the shop in accordance with the license permission and no interference is being made and shall not be made. The said instructions are taken on record. In case, petitioner violates any of the conditions of the license, he shall be intimated in writing through a proper notice in accordance with law. Petition is consigned to record. (Manish Kumar,J) (Vivek Chaudhary,J) Order Date :- 14.12.2023 Ashish High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.