- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 13 December 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 10834/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10834 of 2023 Petitioner :- Bhagwati And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ratnesh Chandra,Shobhit Mohan Shukla Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Mr. Shobhit Mohan Shukla, Advocate has file his vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.4, which is taken on record. He raised a preliminary objection that there is no explanation of delay provided in the present writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the instant petition with the liberty to file a fresh petition, properly explaining the delay in filing the writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel for the State as well as learned counsel for respondent no.4 have no objection to the aforesaid prayer. With the aforesaid liberty, the petition is consigned to record. (Manish Kumar,J.) (Vivek Chaudhary,J.) Order Date :- 13.12.2023 Manoj K. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.