- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 14 December 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 10872/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10872 of 2023 Petitioner :- Arjun Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Urban Planning Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hari Om Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Shri Anurag Shukla, Advocate has filed power on behalf of Lucknow Development Authority, which is taken on record.
¶2Heard learned counsel for petitioner, Shri Anurag Shukla, learned counsel for the Development Authority and learned standing counsel for State.
¶3Petitioner has approached this Court claiming that though he was allotted house no.3/895, Sector 3, Jankipuram Vistar Yojna, Sitapur Road Lucknow and possession letter dated 15.02.2001 was issued in favour of the petitioner providing that the possession be given to the petitioner within 20 days but till date, physical possession of the aforesaid house is not given nor any sale deed is executed in favour of the petitioner despite having regularly taken the installments of the house from the petitioner.
¶4Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would sufficiently be met in case representation of petitioner for the said purposes is considered and decided in a time bound manner.
¶5Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the same.
¶6In view thereof, petitioner is permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.3-Additional Secretary, Lucknow Development Authority, Lucknow raising all his grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents in support of his claim within a period of three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order.
¶7In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.3 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him.
¶8It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law.
¶9With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. . [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 14.12.2023 -Amit K-High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.