Ramapata v. State of U.P. Thru. Commissioner and Secy. Board of Revenue Lko. and Others

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10878 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ramapata Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Commissioner And Secy. Board Of Revenue Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Naresh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Zafar Aziz Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned standing counsel for State.

¶2Present writ petition is filed by the petitioner for the following relief: "(a) a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing/setting aside the impugned order dated 22.07.2019 contained in Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition.

(b) a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 2 to consider and take a decision on representation/appeal dated 31.03.2023 and reminder application dated 20.06.2023 to the higher authority that is District Magistrate, Barabanki U.P. and regarding the claim of the petitioner on merit as contained as Annexure No. 7 to this writ petition in the interest of justice."

¶3Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would sufficiently be met in case representation of petitioner for the said purposes is considered and decided in a time bound manner.

¶4Learned standing counsel and Mr. Zafar Aziz, learned counsel for respondent have no objection to the same.

¶5In view thereof, petitioner is permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.2-District Magistrate, District Barabanki, U.P., raising all his grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents in support of his claim within a period of two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order.

¶6In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him.

¶7It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law.

¶8With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. . [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 14.12.2023 -Amit K-High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench