VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ram Sevak Palaria v. Sri. Sada Kant Prin. Secy Pwd Deptt. and Ors

Dismissed on merits/Rejected
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
14 December 2023
Bench
Rajesh Singh Chauhanauthor
Case no.
CAPL 1285/2017

Judgment

Court No. - 4 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1285 of 2017 Applicant :- Ram Sevak Palaria Opposite Party :- Sri. Sada Kant Prin. Secy Pwd Deptt. And Ors. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashutosh Shahi Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶1Heard.

¶2This Court has passed order dated 6.12.2023, which reads as under : "1. Heard.

¶2This Court has passed order dated 17.11.2023, which reads as under:- "1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Mohit Jauhari, learned Standing Counsel.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that he has filed affidavit/objection against the affidavit of compliance filed by the opposite parties on 30.10.2023, however the same is not traceable.

¶3Sri Mohit Jauhari, learned Standing Counsel has stated that the copy of the aforesaid affidavit is available on his record and he may be given two weeks' time to seek fresh instructions on the aforesaid affidavit, so filed by learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶4List this case in the week commencing 4th of December, 2023, within top ten cases to enable Sri Mohit Jauhari to seek fresh instructions on the aforesaid affidavit, so filed by the petitioner.

¶5Office is directed to trace out the copy of aforesaid affidavit/objection and place the same on record."

¶3Sri Amrendra Pratap Singh, learned Standing Counsel has stated that he could not receive instructions in terms of earlier order, therefore, he may be given some shortest time to seek instructions in terms of earlier order.

¶4List this case on 14.12.2023 to enable Sri Amrendra Pratap Singh, learned Standing Counsel to seek instructions in terms of earlier order, failing which opposite party no.9, namely, Sri Arvind Kumar Jain, Engineer-in-Chief (Development) & Head of Department, Public Works Department, Nirman Bhawan, Lucknow shall appear in person."

¶3In compliance of the aforesaid order Sri Mohit Jauhari has filed fresh affidavit of compliance, same is taken on record.

¶4In the aforesaid affidavit the specific recital has been given in para 7 that the order of the writ court has been complied with in its letter and spirit and copy of order dated 12.12.2023 has been enclosed as Annexure A-1. The aforesaid order reveals that the required exercise for re-fixation of the salary of the petitioner has been undertaken.

¶5In the wake of aforesaid development nothing remains to be adjudicated by this Court in this writ petition.

¶6Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed.

¶7Notices discharged.

¶8If the petitioner still feels aggrieved from the aforesaid order or any of the grievance is still not redressed, the petitioner may approach the competent authority or the competent court of law for the same. . [Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.] Order Date :- 14.12.2023 Om High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.