VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mubarak @ Lallu and 5 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko and 3 Others

Dismissed on merits/Rejected
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
14 December 2023
Bench
Rajeev Singhauthor
Case no.
12061/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 12061 of 2023 Applicant :- Mubarak @ Lallu And 5 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Desh Mitra Anand,Jitesh Singh @ J.K.Chaudhary Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶2The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed with the prayer to to direct the learned trial court that (i) applicants whose appearance is noted and have submitted their personal & surety bonds should not be insisted to obtain bail and order in respect of acceptance of the same be passed, (ii) it may further be directed that Trial Court should not send & keep applicants in jail without concluding fair trial as per law ignoring the irrelevant, non reasonable & illegal suggestions offered & submitted behalf of on complainant.

¶3Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that there is a presumption that applicant might be taken into custody by the court below, despite order passed on 22.11.2023 by which application under Section 88 Cr.P.C. accepted and personal bond & two surety bonds were already submitted, therefore, kind indulgence of this Court is necessary.

¶4Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer of the applicant and has submitted that the offence is related to the provisions of POCSO Act alongwith the provisions of Indian Penal Code, and the application under Section 88 Cr.P.C. wrongly accepted by the court below. He further submitted that the applicant was directed to furnish personal bond of Rs.20,000/- & two sureties and same has already been submitted, therefore, no such relief as prayed can be granted by this Court.

¶5Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, going through the contents of the application as well as other relevant documents, no such prayer can be granted to the applicant, accordingly, present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is misconceived and is hereby, dismissed. Order Date :- 14.12.2023 Gaurav/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.