Sunder Lal U/A 227 v. District and Sessions Judge District Unnao and Others

Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3161 of 2014 Petitioner :- Sunder Lal U/A 227 Respondent :- District And Sessions Judge District Unnao And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Madhur Kant Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Manish Kumar Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. C.M.Application No.IA/3 of 2022 C.M.Application No.IA/4 of 2022 Heard. These are the applications for substitution and condonation of delay in filing the application for substitution on account of death of sole petitioner. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the legal heirs of the petitioner want to withdraw this petition, therefore the substitution may be allowed and the application for withdrawal filed by the petitioner may be allowed. The applications are allowed. The delay in filing the substitution application is condoned. Let the substitution be incorporated during course of the day. . .C.M.Application No.IA/6 of 2023 Heard Shri Madhur Kant Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petition and it may be dismissed as such. Despite sufficient service none has put in appearance. The application is allowed. The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. . .. .................................... (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Order Date :- 14.12.2023 Banswar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench