Suprotik Banerji and Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 116 of 2021 Applicant :- Suprotik Banerji And Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Nandita Bharti Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Navita Sharma,Piyush Singh Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

¶1Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 is taken on record.

¶2Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶3The present application has been filed for summoning the impugned cognizance/ summoning order dated 22.05.2020 and the order dated 22.12.2020 whereby bailable warrants have been issued against the applicants by the learned Special Judge, P.O.C.S.O. Court, Lucknow in Criminal case No.666 of 2020 (State Vs. Suprotik Banerji & others) as well as the charge-sheet dated 23.10.2019 filed U/s 323, 427, 498-A, 504, 506 I.P.C. against the applicant nos. 1 & 2 and U/s 323, 354-B, 427, 498-A, 504, 506 I.P.C. & Section 7/8 P.O.S.C.O. Act against the applicant no. 3 and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 666 of 2020 (State Vs. Suprotik Banerji & others) arising from Case Crime No.429/2018 U/s 323, 427, 498-A, 504, 506 I.P.C. & Section 7/8 P.O.S.C.O. Act registered at Police Station-Krishna Nagar, Lucknow against the applicants.

¶4Learned counsel for the applicants submits that due to inadvertence, in the prayer of memo of present application, P.S.- Kotwali Nagar, District-Barabanki has wrongly been typed in place of P.S.- Krishna Nagar, District-Lucknow, hence, permission may be granted to correct the same.

¶5The prayer for correction in the prayer of memo of present application is allowed and learned counsel for the applicants is permitted to make necessary amendments in the prayer of memo of present application, forthwith.

¶6Learned counsels for the parties jointly submit that all the issues has already been resolved between the parties in terms of compromised dated 14.12.2023 which is annexed as Annexure-S.A.-1 of Supplementary Affidavit. They requests that the present application may be disposed of in terms of aforesaid compromise.

¶7Learned A.G.A. opposes the prayer of applicants but he does not have any objection on the above submissions.

¶8Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2, learned A.G.A. and going through the contents of application, supplementary affidavit, agreement/compromise dated

14.12.2023 as well as other relevant documents; this Court is of the view that the present application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of in terms of aforesaid compromise.

¶9The aforesaid compromise would be the part of the order. Order Date :- 14.12.2023 Arpan High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench