Najmi Begam v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayat Raj Lko and 7 Others

Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9588 of 2023 Petitioner :- Najmi Begam Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayat Raj Lko And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Devendra Nath Upadhyay,Santosh Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no.1 to 7, and Sri Tusar Gupta holding brief of Sri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for respondent no.8.

¶2With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being decided finally.

¶3The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having worked as Caretaker she has not been paid salary from July 2021 to August 2023 and has also not been permitted to work further.

¶4Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.6 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsels for respondents have no objection.

¶5In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.6 then respondent no.6 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order.

¶6With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off.

¶7It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 15.12.2023 A. Katiyar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench