Pankaj Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9948 of 2023 Applicant :- Pankaj Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Amol Kumar Srivastava,Pawan Kumar,Shivanshu Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶1Heard Sri Pawan Kumar, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Akhilesh Kumar Vyas, the learned AGA for the State and perused the records.

¶2The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicants on bail in Case Crime No. 13 of 2020, under Sections 419, 420, 120-B IPC, Sections 66-C & 66-D of Information Technology Act, Police Station Cyber Crime, District Lucknow.

¶3The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an FIR registered on 23.12.2020 alleging a fraudulent withdrawal made form the informant's bank account on 20.01.2021 after the informant received a call from a mobile number. The police claimed to have arrested five persons on the basis of information received from a mukhbir. Some other persons were arrested in connection with similar offences in Deogarh, Jharkhand and on the basis of their statements, the applicant was also implicated in the present case.

¶4In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that prior to his arrest, the applicant was not involved in any criminal case but after his arrest, he has been implicated in nine cases, in eight of which he has already been granted bail. Details of those nine cases have been mentioned in the affidavit filed in support of the application.

¶5The learned A.G.A. has submitted that the mobile number, from which a phone call was received by the informant, was used in commission of another crime.

¶6The applicant was implicated on the basis of a mobile number used in the commission of offence but he claimed that the said mobile number has not been issued in his name.

¶7Although a charge sheet in the present case was filed on

21.02.2022, the learned counsel for the applicant has stated that till date even the charges have not been framed in the present case.

¶8The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has been granted bail in a case of similar nature.

¶9The co-accused Gautam Mandal has already been granted bail in the present case by means of an order dated 30.11.2023 passed by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 4081 of 2023, and therefore, the present applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity.

¶10Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has been implicated in the present case solely on the basis of the custodial statement of the co-accused person and that the applicant is languishing in jail since 01.09.2021 and the trial is yet to commence, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

¶11Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.

¶12Let the applicant-Pankaj Kumar be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. Order Date :- 15.12.2023 Shravan High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench