- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 15 December 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 10896/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10896 of 2023 Petitioner :- M/S Saviour Envirotech Thru. Its Prop. Rajnish Sinha Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addil. Chief Secy. Urban Develop. Deptt. Govt. Civil Secrt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Savita Jain Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rishabh Kapoor Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. Petitioner had supplied certain machineries to the respondents and the respondents claim that it was not satisfactory, hence they had only made part of the payment and disputed the remaining part. In the given circumstances, there is dispute between the private parties for payment of remaining amount, hence the present writ petition is not maintainable. The writ petition is consigned to record with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate petition. . [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 15.12.2023 S. Kumar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.