- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 16 December 2023
- Bench
- Rajnish Kumar
- Case no.
- 6293/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6293 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ram Surat And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj, Civil Sectt. Lko. And 11 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anjani Kumar Dvivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. Learned Standing Counsel raised a preliminary objection that this petition has been filed by the petitioner no.4 Vinay Kumar alongwith with his affidavit, who is the appellant(Vinay Kumar) in Appeal No.0016 under Section 6(A) U.P. Panchayat Raj (Kutumb Ragistero ka Anurakshan) Niymawali(Ram Surat versus Manoj Kumar), adding @ Mithilesh Kumar and with the I.D. of Mithilesh Kumar, which cannot be done at this stage, that too without any proof. Sri Anjani Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file fresh in the correct name with the correct I.D. Dismissed accordingly as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. Order Date :- 16.12.2023 Akanksha High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.