- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 16 December 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 10955/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10955 of 2023 Petitioner :- Aqbal Ahmad And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue U.P. Govt. Civil Secrt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rayees Ahmad Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Shri Dilip Kumar Pathak, Advocate, who has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no. 5, which is taken on record. Petitioner has approached this Court with the following main relief:- "A writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite party no. 2 to 4 to register the case of the petitioners filed on 07.07.2020 (Aqbal Ahmad and others Vs. Rasheed Ahmad and others) and allot the case number and proceed in the matter as expeditiously as per the provision of Section 24 (3) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 in the interest of justice. " Learned Standing Counsel on the basis of instructions states that the case has already been registered as T202108100201082 before Sub Divisional Officer, Tulsipur, District Balrampur. The report of R.I. has also come. The said statement is taken on record. Writ petition is consigned to record. S.D.M. concerned is expected to dispose of the case within a period of 90 days from today on the basis of proper survey report. (Manish Kumar,J) (Vivek Chaudhary,J) Order Date :- 16.12.2023/Ashish High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.