Amar Nath Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home U.P. Govt. Civil Sectt. Lko and Others

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10953 of 2023 Petitioner :- Amar Nath Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home U.P. Govt. Civil Sectt. Lko And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Zafar Aziz Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Zafar Aziz, learned Counsel for the Insurance Company. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that claim of the petitioner has been rejected by respondent no. 4-Insurance Company and the same is pending before respondent no. 2-District Magistrate, Gonda. Learned Counsel for the Insurance Company raises a preliminary objection that the claim filed by the petitioner before respondent no. 2 is time barred. The said objection can always be raised before respondent no.

¶2Without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, it is hereby provided that the pending claim of the petitioner filed before the District Magistrate, Gonda Hardoi may be considered and decided within a period of two months from the date of certified copy of this order is served in accordance with law. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (Manish Kumar,J) (Vivek Chaudhary,J) Order Date :- 16.12.2023 Ashish High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench