Bhanmati v. State of U.P. Thru. Distt. Magistrate Sultanpur and 5 Others

Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9610 of 2023 Petitioner :- Bhanmati Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Distt. Magistrate Sultanpur And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Narendra Pratap Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh,Shailendra Singh Rajawat Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 and 2, Sri Saurabh Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri S.S.Rajawat, learned counsel for the respondents no, 3, 4 & 6 and Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.5. With the consent of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the contesting parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having been selected as Cook, he has still not been appointed. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.5 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel, Sri Saurabh Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri S.S.Rajawat, learned counsel for the respondents no, 3, 4 & 6 and Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.5. have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent No.5 then the respondent No.5 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 16.12.2023 Pachhere/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench