Badri Nath Dixit v. Bimal Kumar Dubey M.D. U.P.Co-Op.Sugar Fact.Fed.Ltd. and Anr

Court No. - 4 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2368 of 2020 Applicant :- Badri Nath Dixit Opposite Party :- Bimal Kumar Dubey M.D. U.P.Co-Op.Sugar Fact.Fed.Ltd. And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Lalendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Sudhanshu Chauhan Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶1Heard Sri Lalendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sudhanshu Chauhan, learned counsel for the opposite parties.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the order of Writ Court has been complied with and the same fact has been stated by Sri Sudhanshu Chauhan, learned counsel for the opposite parties. However, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that his entire grievance has not been redressed, therefore the liberty may be given to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned for claiming his further grievance, if any.

¶3Be that as it may, since the order of Writ Court has been complied with, therefore, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present contempt petition.

¶4Accordingly, the instant contempt petition is dismissed.

¶5Notices, if any, stand discharged.

¶6However, it is always open for the petitioner to raise his appropriate grievance, if any, before the Competent Authority, strictly in accordance with law. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 15.12.2023 kkv/ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench